home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1180 / 1180p020.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  80KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky | tree
OCR: the ground that the seizure there was of personal property. Pet. App. 14a. In view "real property distinct from personal for due process purposes because the fact that real property cannot be moved eliminates the need for very prompt ac tion Ibid. Ir addition. although Good did you reside on the respondent property. hut was instead renting 15 tenants, the court nonetheless found preseizure hearing necessary hecause "[p] eople have particu- larly strong interest in their homes and the govern- ment has leas significant interest in secking for- feiture prior giving notice and opportunity be heard. 14a-1 15a SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The court of apneals fundamentally erred in it: disposition of two distinct issues of broad importance in the administration 0f the federal forfeiture laws. The Due Pro ...